LK162-12 I2C Voltage & Signaling Speed
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2002 10:41 pm
I'm having trouble getting I2C to work on an LK162-12 display. I have three questions.
1) I'm driving the display in a 3.3V system (my I2C bus has pull-ups to 3.3V, not 5V). What is the threshold (Vih) for the I2C input on the LK162-12? Normally, this works because 3.3V is usually higher than the Vih of most devices, but maybe it matters for the LK162-12.
2) My I2C interface operates through software bit banging and SCL is running at 10 KHz, not 100 KHz. Is there any reason why this should be a problem? Is there a lower limit to the SCL clock speed?
3) One version of the manual (the web version of the manual from 2 months ago) for this module said "The LK162-12 does not work on I2C by default; one modification has to be done, as shown in the picture." But, there is no picture and there is no description of the modification. This text used to be the first paragraph of section 2.1.4, I2C Communications. The new PDF version of the LK162-12 User's Guide does not have this statement. Was this a typo? Can I ignore this statement?
Thanks
Mike
1) I'm driving the display in a 3.3V system (my I2C bus has pull-ups to 3.3V, not 5V). What is the threshold (Vih) for the I2C input on the LK162-12? Normally, this works because 3.3V is usually higher than the Vih of most devices, but maybe it matters for the LK162-12.
2) My I2C interface operates through software bit banging and SCL is running at 10 KHz, not 100 KHz. Is there any reason why this should be a problem? Is there a lower limit to the SCL clock speed?
3) One version of the manual (the web version of the manual from 2 months ago) for this module said "The LK162-12 does not work on I2C by default; one modification has to be done, as shown in the picture." But, there is no picture and there is no description of the modification. This text used to be the first paragraph of section 2.1.4, I2C Communications. The new PDF version of the LK162-12 User's Guide does not have this statement. Was this a typo? Can I ignore this statement?
Thanks
Mike